alt.education

On Sep 17, 9:23 am, "Matt Barrow"
wrote:
> "Don Homuth" < > wrote in message
>
> news:fu5te39noogtssg7litgn5hla8sb0t9es1@ ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:08:51 -0700, lein
> > wrote:
>
> >>On Sep 2, 8:47 am, Don Homuth < > wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 08:35:20 -0700, "Curt" wrote:
>
> >>> >"Don" wrote in message
> >>> >news:fbbs4702ju5@ ...
> >>> >> They've been doing this for more than a decade in SW FL and they call
> >>> >> it
> >>> >an
> >>> >> *Impact Fee*.
> >>> >> It is an additional fee for new construction, claiming the new
> >>> >> building
> >>> >will
> >>> >> have a significant *impact* on the community.
>
> >>> >New houses do.
>
> >>> But not necessarily a positive impact.
>
> >>Would you rather those people live under bridges?
>
> > Your argument is apparently in favor of public-supplied housing.
> > Folks who live under bridges are not in a position to purchase a
> > house.
>
> Don't feed the trolls (pun intended).

Oregon Food Bank inadequite.