Group: alt.education
From: "Matt Barrow"
Date: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: New Law in Oregon: Construction Fee for Schools


"Don Homuth" < > wrote in message
news:iu6te35svs1cahl8a9ipvarsnuocfl6h2p@ ...
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:22:19 -0700, "Matt Barrow"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Don Homuth" < > wrote in message
>>news:hp5te3lbhor6bkc6nlmankeqkcprsn9grk@ ...
>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:15:45 -0400, "Don"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Was reading an article the other day in my FL hometown newspaper online
>>>>that
>>>>for every $1000 increase in a homes cost, 871 people in the county
>>>>cannot
>>>>qualify for the loan.
>>>
>>> Not everyone can afford to purchase a house, clearly, else there would
>>> be no market for apartments and rentals.
>>>
>>> But...it's also the case that the True Cost of new construction does
>>> not incur the true costs of what other citizens must pay to accomodate
>>> it. Including, but hardly limited to schools required to deal with
>>> the kids from the families that move in.
>>
>>At least not families with four, five, six kids.
>>
>>As opposed to families with zero kids.
>
> A meaningless discussion, since all citizens bear the cost of public
> schools, and reasonably so.

Right on the first part, wrong on the second.