Archie Leach's Sockpuppet writes:
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Sockpuppet?
>>>> Note: no response.
>> Note: still no response.
Note: still no response.
>>>>>>>> 368> that is, 6,593 line in just *this* message!
>>>>>>>> Hundreds of lines fewer than in Sockpuppet's message, Malloy. Yet you
>>>>>>>> didn't say a thing about that. Classic inconsistency.
>>>>>>> Whiner.
>>>>>> I'm well aware that Malloy is a whiner, Sockpuppet. No need to tell
>>>>>> me about it.
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> On your part, Sockpuppet, given that Malloy's whining is shown above,
>>>> which constitutes substantiation.
>> Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
>>>>> Puerile to boot.
>>>> I'm well aware that your unsubstantiated and erroneous claim is puerile,
>>>> Sockpuppet. No need to tell me about it.
>>> I'm well aware of your deep-seated need to resort to puerile Pee Wee
>>> Herman "I Know You Are But What Am I" responses when unable to compose
>>> rational responses, Tholen. No need to remind me about it.
>> Classic hallucination on your part, Sockpuppet.
> I'm well aware of your hallucinations, Tholen. No need to tell me
> about them.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Sockpuppet? I
clearly referred to the hallucinations on your part, Sockpuppet.