On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:06:45 -0700, OrangeDood wrote...
> > > >> > Hmm.....how would it be any different than a Nat Assoc of
> > > >> > Black Journalists? Wouldn't the goals be the same?
> >
> > > >> No, I think not. The NABJ seeks to level the playing field.
> > > >> Some prospective NAWJ would be opposed to leveling the playing
> > > >> field, because that would mean less jobs for white journalists.
> >
> > > > Is it your belief that there are no members of the NABJ who seek
> > > > to tilt the playing field in favor of black journalists?
> >
> > > Well, I would hesitate to say "no" but "hardly any" would be OK.
> >
> > Who gets to decide when the playing field is level?
>
> Seriously? What kind of a stupid fucking question is that?
What I mean is when is it no longer okay for racist organizations to
exist? You seem to claim that the NABJ is okay, as they seek only to
level the playing field. Presumably, once the playing field is level
then there is no need for the NABJ to exist. In fact, for them to
continue to exist at that point would put them on par with any putative
NAWJ. So I ask you, who gets to decide when it's no longer okay?
--
A. Summers || summerstorm0007-->at<--