In Chris Bellomy
> In Daniel Seriff
>> Don't you talk ugly to me, stephenj. I'll send you to the moon with my magic
>> shirt!
>>
>>> Trevor Zion Bauknight wrote:
>>>> What was the prevailing scientific understanding of animal diversity at
>>>> that time? (Hint: it wasn't evolution).
>>>
>>> It couldn't have been creationism, since creationism has never had any
>>> scientific backing.
>>
>> THIS IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON.
>>
>>>> Times have changed. You might consider catching up.
>>>
>>> A1 hasn't changed - that's the key thing to keep in mind.
>>
>> THIS IS ALSO COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. YOU ARE STILL A FUCKING MORON.
> If it helps any, Dan, you are arguing with someone whose
> reputation for intellectual rigor is well known in these
> parts.
> Which is another way of saying that it's ok to let it drop.
BUT HE'S A PERFESSOR!!!!11111!~~~!!!
--
-to reply, it's hot not warm
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ Rich Hammett /~rhammett
/ He always pictured himself a libertarian, which to my
\ way of thinking means ``I want the liberty to grow rich
/ and you can have the liberty to starve''. It's easy to
\ believe that no one should depend on society for help
/ when you yourself happen not to need such help.