rec.sport.football.college

>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:46:08 -0000, rich hammett wrote:
>>olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Trent Woodruff:
>>>On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:21:58 -0000, rich hammett wrote:
>>>>olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, David V. Loewe, Jr:
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:58:49 -0000, rich hammett

>>>>>Now, if you weren't just making a whining irrelevance, what,
>>>>>exactly, in that post was the problem? This is your last
>>>>>chance, and you're lucky you get it, after you bailed on your
>>>>>last one.

>>>> Bailed? Dude... I'm *still* waiting on a response from you in the JC
>>>> Watts thread. All I'm hearing are crickets. Don't give me some
>>>> bullshit about how *I* bailed in some thread you won't even *name*.

>>>I was talking about THIS thread.

>> That's some serious hypocricy.

>How? He's successfully dodged it for 3 straight posts.

Which is quite equivalent to your ignoring his request for information
in another thread and this one (combined) more than three posts (three
just in this thread alone).

>I have no
>idea what thread he's talking about, but I seriously doubt I made
>a claim about his words that I refused to explain what I meant.

Even though he's told you straight up several times which thread it
is? Really?



--


...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When
you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I
dismiss yours.
- Stephen Roberts