alt.education

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:20:00 -0400, in
Danwood wrote in < @ >:
>Dave Oldridge wrote:
>> Martin Phipps wrote in
>> news: @ :
>>
>>> On Sep 22, 2:01 am, Dave Oldridge
>>> wrote:
>>>> Martin Phipps wrote
>>>> innews: @ :
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 22, 12:37 am, Jd wrote:
>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>> -Snip-
>>>>>>> It says that there is no evidence about this supposed event.
>>>>>> I'm savging bandwidth and being a witness of the resurrection at
>>>>>> the same time. But pick and choose your evidence like you do
>>>>>> petrified bone fragments.
>>>>> Show us a fossil of your god.
>>>> Uh, fossils are the remains of dead animals and plants.
>>> Which is how we know them to have existed. No such evidence exists of
>>> your god(s).
>>
>> True, but then who in their right mind would expect fossil evidence for
>> the existence of God?
>>
>This is tantamount to their demands. They want physical evidence. But
>it's impossible to examine God under a microscope, observe with a
>telescope or measure him by some scientific scale. But for me
>personally, I am unconvinced that there is a greater power than
>man in existence.

I just want them to tell me what evidence they have for God if they have
so many excuses for why they don't have evidence.

>So, there are at least 10% atheist in our society (US) and
>that's fine. I don't care about 'converting' anyone to my
>belief. But I demand the right to defend ideas against
>unjustified and uncalled for charges and attacks.
>
>Danwood
>>