On Sep 23, 8:31 am, Dave Oldridge
wrote:
> Martin Phipps
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 1:46 am, Dave Oldridge
> > wrote:
> >> Martin Phipps
> >> innews: @ :
>
> >> > On Sep 21, 9:35 am, Dave Oldridge
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Your "overwhelming evidence" consists entirely of biased opinions.
>
> >> > No, it doesn't, you lying piece of shit. I can only assume you
> >> > didn't
> >> > bother to read the article I copied and pasted here. I'm not
>
> >> And yes I did. But I also happened to note that it was full of
> >> opinions that are as substantiated as your lie about me above.
>
> > Once again, you prove yourself to be a liar. You either didn't read
> > it but claim that you did or are lying about it's contents. Does it
> > make you proud to know that you are nothing but a liar?
>
> Does it make you proud to lie about me like this, showing that YOU are
> nothing but a liar? You make my case over and over and over again.
How old are you? Four? Christopher Lee called you a liar and now
everybody who disagrees with you you now call a liar. Maybe instead
you should go back and re-evaluate WHY people are calling you a liar.
The fact is that we present you with evidence for our position, you
cover you eyes and say "Nah nah nah! I can't see any evidence!" and
then claim that all we have is opinions. Grow up.
Martin